A "Seminar" of liberal scholars has received considerable media coverage regarding their subjective speculation that only a small percentage of the words of Yeshua can be traced back credibly to his historical personage. These skeptics want us to believe that his followers were engaged in fiction writing and placed many sayings in his mouth: words, that is, which his followers actually authored. Now also we have so-called "Evangelicals" who say the same thing about Rav Shaul, that he didn't write II Thessalonians or the Pastoral Epistles, etc, but that these works were actually the writings of his followers. These same skeptical assessments are made also about other books, like the Shliach Kefa's second epistle. The reasoning given is that the same author cannot use different vocabulary or writing style in two or more different writings and, if he does not express himself exactly the same way, another person must then be the real author. Now, think about that. A hundred years from now, someone will read EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO GROW A MESSIANIC SYNAGOGUE and then they will read THE NEW CREATION BOOK FOR MUSLIMS and they will decide that the same person could not have written both works, because the vocabulary, style, diction, everything, is completely different. Well, I can assure you that I wrote both works and purposely styled them in completely different ways for different reading audiences, one Jewish, one Muslim. It is better to trust that Scripture is the Word of G-d and that every word is G-d-breathed by the Holy Spirit than to try to speculate about who really wrote what or who really said what. Just because a "majority of Ph.D.'s" say something doesn't make it true. They are not an elite club with a corner on the truth. This website is committed to the inerrancy of Holy Scripture and that the stated authorship of every book of the Bible is to be taken at face value as true.